Pod Think?
Problem is, that ideology tends to hem in and channel thought and this often occurs under the radar. Usually these pods originate with a "cultivator" who clearly has a particular bias in relation to a worldview (of course not all).
Many of the pods that I've joined, over the past approx 2 years, that adhere to an ideological perspective I've pretty much made myself scarce. That's because i don't adhere to any precise ideology and enjoy, as the integralists call it, "juggling perspectives." Yet, this has a tendency to rain on the parade.
Of course, if folks can't pin you down to any specific opinion or way of thinking they then tend to get mighty perturbed. They then indict you as playing the game of "devils advocate" and, lets face it, nobody likes the devil.
In addition, what tends to occur, based on my brief study of pod member relations, is that certain pod regulars acquire a 'reputation.' This is because they often veer off course from the preordained path originally laid down by the pod originators. I have noted that frequently these folks are asked to exit or, most likely, they finally exit on their own since they feel their ideas are somewhat unwelcome and, like old soldiers they tend to just fade away.
"GroupThink" has been studied fairly extensivley by the psychological sciences and WIKI defines it as:
"a type of thought exhibited by group members who try to minimize conflict without critically testing, analyzing, and evaluating ideas. Individual creativity, uniqueness and independent thinking are lost in the pursuit of group cohesiveness as are the advantages of reasonable balance in choice and thought that might normally be obtained by making decisions as a group. During groupthink, members of the group avoid promoting viewpoints outside the comfort zone of consensus thinking."Ahhh... good 'ole "comfot zone"! This seems to be an afflicton of many of the pods particularly those that rely extensively on some ideological basis as foundation for all discussion. In fact, as I write this I opened a gaia email, of a response to a previous comment I had made, asking me not to contribute any more "negative crap " HA! Gotta love it.
You see critical, analytical thinking which digs into ideas and "parses" perspectives (another accusation leveled against me) to discover the richness below the surface. However, digging in the dirt is not pretty and many would prefer we not do that!
Notice that the groupthink's chief defining property is the reduction of conflict. Therefore, making comments of a negative nature (and I don't mean offensive or attacking which are not welcome in any conversation) are anathema to most pod agendas.
In fact, this post will be construed in just such a manner by many of the 'positive' folks and because of its negative undertones will most probably be ignored.
Anyway, enough rambling. I haven't been posting for awhile, so I thought I'd simply jump in as my old controversial self and let 'er rip!
because....every rose has its thorns!
Peace Angels,
mike

Help



